Blog

  • Home
  • News
  • Different Treatment and Different Outcome
You Are Here:

Different Treatment and Different Outcome

Posted on | Posted in News

Employers who want to treat employees, who guilty of, essentially, the same offence, differently need to take note of two cases.

 General Mills (Berwick) Limited v Glovaki

An employee (S) breached health and safety procedures and as a result, suffered serious injuries.

S was unable to work or participate in disciplinary proceedings. He was eventually dismissed on ill health grounds (capability) following medical advice that he would never be able to return to his job.

Subsequently, another employee (G) was guilty of similar behaviour as S but he was not injured. G was dismissed for gross misconduct. G claimed it was unfair because S had not been dismissed for gross misconduct. The Tribunal decided G’s dismissal was unfair. On appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) disagreed and overturned the Tribunal’s decision that G’s dismissal was unfair.

 The question was whether a reasonable employer would have taken the same decision to treat G differently to S. Given the Tribunal’s finding that S would have been dismissed if he had not been too ill to work or attend a disciplinary hearing, the dismissal of G was, in the EAT’s judgment, fair.

 Conversely, in First Glasgow Limited v Robertson the outcome was different.

A Bus Driver (R) interfered with a CCTV camera in the driver’s cab. R had already received a final written warning earlier the same year in relation to a different matter. R was dismissed for gross misconduct.

Two other Drivers, who had also been found guilty of interfering with CCTV cameras in their cabs, received final warnings. In dismissing R, his employer placed no reliance on the live final written warning (a bit stupid!).

Trehtowans’ view:

 The Tribunal found that R’s dismissal was unfair because he had been treated more harshly than the other Drivers who had been found guilty of the same misconduct. The employer appealed against the decision to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). In relation to this aspect of the appeal, the EAT’s Judgment reads “We can deal with the..(appeal)..briefly. It is not well founded”. The EAT went on to say that, had the live final warning been taken into account by the employer, it might have made the different treatment reasonable and the dismissal fair, but they had not and so it was not. A lack of consideration of the live final warning meant that there was no reason for R to be dismissed when other employees, who had been found guilty of the same misconduct, were not. His dismissal was, therefore, unfair.

0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts
17 Feb 2020

Do you hate job boards? Why registering with a recruitment agency helps your job search

Are you tired of spending hours online searching for jobs? Applying for hundreds of positions and not receiving so much as an acknowledgement? Fed-up of being unemployed or unhappy with your current career path? Here at Wote Street People, we always strive to find the perfect match between candidate and employer – something that cannot[…..]

Latest Posts
20 Dec 2019

When the going gets tough: celebrating resilience

Wote Street People sponsors University of Winchester Resilience Award With Christmas nearly upon us, the ‘silly season’ starts – parties ramp up, office life slows down, and chat about what everyone is doing this year is as plentiful as the supply of festive bakes. But it’s not the most wonderful time of the year for[…..]

Latest Posts
04 Nov 2019

Boringstoke to Amazingstoke: 3 reasons why Basingstoke is a great place to look for work in 2020

Another year is almost over and with less than 50 shopping days before Christmas, you may also be thinking about a career move in the New Year. Why not consider a job in Basingstoke? Located in Basing View, one of Basingstoke’s growing business communities, Wote Street People know what a great place Basingstoke is to[…..]

Latest Posts
06 Aug 2019

It’s not (all) about the money: what graduates want from a graduate job

– “Graduates want more from life – we know we’re going to live ‘til we’re 100, have five different careers in our lifetimes, so we want to enjoy ourselves.” – The summer months always see an influx of enthusiastic graduates, fresh from universities and business schools across the UK; looking to establish their career path[…..]

Latest Posts
22 Jul 2019

Don’t take the Men-o-pause literally – women over 50 can add real value to your business!

According to the CIPD report, women over the age of 50 are the fastest growing segment of the workforce.  So, why do so many suffer from age discrimination?  Possibly it’s to do with the common, but sometimes misunderstood symptoms that affect lots of women between the ages of 45-55, including hot flushes, headaches, aches and[…..]