Blog

  • Home
  • News
  • Different Treatment and Different Outcome
You Are Here:

Different Treatment and Different Outcome

Posted on | Posted in News

Employers who want to treat employees, who guilty of, essentially, the same offence, differently need to take note of two cases.

 General Mills (Berwick) Limited v Glovaki

An employee (S) breached health and safety procedures and as a result, suffered serious injuries.

S was unable to work or participate in disciplinary proceedings. He was eventually dismissed on ill health grounds (capability) following medical advice that he would never be able to return to his job.

Subsequently, another employee (G) was guilty of similar behaviour as S but he was not injured. G was dismissed for gross misconduct. G claimed it was unfair because S had not been dismissed for gross misconduct. The Tribunal decided G’s dismissal was unfair. On appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) disagreed and overturned the Tribunal’s decision that G’s dismissal was unfair.

 The question was whether a reasonable employer would have taken the same decision to treat G differently to S. Given the Tribunal’s finding that S would have been dismissed if he had not been too ill to work or attend a disciplinary hearing, the dismissal of G was, in the EAT’s judgment, fair.

 Conversely, in First Glasgow Limited v Robertson the outcome was different.

A Bus Driver (R) interfered with a CCTV camera in the driver’s cab. R had already received a final written warning earlier the same year in relation to a different matter. R was dismissed for gross misconduct.

Two other Drivers, who had also been found guilty of interfering with CCTV cameras in their cabs, received final warnings. In dismissing R, his employer placed no reliance on the live final written warning (a bit stupid!).

Trehtowans’ view:

 The Tribunal found that R’s dismissal was unfair because he had been treated more harshly than the other Drivers who had been found guilty of the same misconduct. The employer appealed against the decision to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). In relation to this aspect of the appeal, the EAT’s Judgment reads “We can deal with the..(appeal)..briefly. It is not well founded”. The EAT went on to say that, had the live final warning been taken into account by the employer, it might have made the different treatment reasonable and the dismissal fair, but they had not and so it was not. A lack of consideration of the live final warning meant that there was no reason for R to be dismissed when other employees, who had been found guilty of the same misconduct, were not. His dismissal was, therefore, unfair.

0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts
23 Jun 2020

In the pursuit of happiness: Supporting the M3 Job Club and other community groups

Part of our culture at Wote Street is about giving back.  Our core values are: we listen, we consult, we care and that fits perfectly with all of the charities and community groups we support locally. The Pink Place – supporting people affected by cancer Basingstoke Consortium & Skillstree – helping young people to gain[…..]

Latest Posts
25 May 2020

‘Why sending your CV is the hardest way of landing a job’

Don’t get us wrong, a CV is an important tool when applying for jobs – but it’s only one of the items in your job seekers toolkit. (If you need some help developing your CV we’ve written a blog to help or feel free to give us a ring and we’ll happily review.) Getting to[…..]

Latest Posts
19 May 2020

Mental Health Awareness Week

There couldn’t be a better time for Mental Health Awareness week.  Now that the government restrictions due to the corona virus are being lifted, more people are anxious about the repercussions. It’s still out there; bosses and employees alike are trying to make the journey to work and the work environment a relatively safe place[…..]

Latest Posts
18 May 2020

Small but mighty: 3 perks of working with an independent recruitment agency that boasts a nationwide network

We connect the best-matched candidates and businesses – the people brokers. Taking the time to find the right-fit for candidates and customers alike increases the probability of candidates being happy in not only your new role but blossoming in the right company culture. And companies achieving higher staff retention, effective teams and increased staff productivity. […..]

Latest Posts
07 May 2020

What shall we learn from our enforced time together?

Tomorrow we have a bank holiday on a Friday!  Special because this normally only happens for Good Friday at Easter.  Not so special because the majority are at home already and have been for at least 7 weeks.  The Covid-19 outbreak has turned normality on its head.  As indeed did World War II, the end[…..]