Blog

You Are Here:

Innocent until proven guilty?

Posted on | Posted in News

The central issue to the appeal in Stuart v London City Airport was the reasonableness of the employer’s investigation into the employee’s alleged dishonesty.

By way of background, the Claimant had worked for the Respondent for 8 years, he had an unblemished record and had recently been referred to as ‘excellent’ in his appraisal. While the Claimant was queuing to purchase several items in a shop in the Respondent’s premises, he was beckoned over to talk to another employee. After speaking to this employee, he walked over to different retail premises to purchase a drink. At this point, he was stopped by a Police Officer as he was suspected of dishonestly removing the goods from the first shop. The employee was suspended while an investigation was conducted into the matter.

During the investigation, the Respondent did not gather evidence from the member of staff that beckoned the Claimant over or the store assistant working in the shop at the time of the alleged incident. The Respondent also chose not to review the CCTV footage of the Claimant that was available.

The Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim of unfair dismissal on the grounds that the Respondent had formed a reasonable belief as to the Claimant’s dishonesty and breach of trust following a reasonable investigation.

The Claimant subsequently appealed on the basis that the Tribunal’s decision was perverse. He argued that, as the accusation was a serious allegation of criminal misbehaviour which questioned his integrity, it was necessary for the investigation to look into all the circumstances carefully. There had been significant dispute over the events that had occurred during the alleged incident and as such, there should have been further investigation into this.

The Respondent submitted that the Tribunal had correctly considered the appropriate law, the Claimant’s critique of the investigation and his unblemished record. As the Respondent had considered these issues before coming to their conclusion that the dismissal was fair, the decision of the Employment Tribunal was sustainable and should be upheld.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that there had been several issues that went to the heart of the allegation of dishonest conduct which remained uncertain and further investigation could have clarified these. If the Respondent had taken further statements and reviewed the available CCTV footage, this could have given considerable clarity to the Claimant’s actions inside and outside the store.

The Judgment was clear that if an employee is in a position of trust and is suspected to have dishonestly taken goods from the premises where he works without paying for them, this allegation will always be serious. As a result, any such allegation will always require careful investigation. These investigations should always include evidence which might potentially justify the employee’s actions, or is consistent with the innocent explanation that is offered.

Trethowans’ view:

Employers should ensure that they do not ignore any available evidence when conducting an investigation into an employee’s conduct, especially evidence that supports the employee’s innocence. Employers should also remember that where the integrity of the employee is in question, a higher level of investigation will be required by the Tribunal. This is especially the case where the employee has a strong defence to the allegation. Without a thorough investigation, it will be difficult for an employer to illustrate that a dismissal based on this investigation was fair.

www.trethowans.com

0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts
25 Jul 2018

Educate employers about benefits of older workers

The latest report from the Government’s Women and Equalities Committee says older workers still face discrimination and the recruitment industry’s ‘failure to take more robust action has a significant impact on (their) ability to access work’. Maxine Hart, our Operations Director, has something to say. Valuing best practice The report is pretty damning stuff. But[…..]

Latest Posts
28 Jun 2018

Feeling hot, hot, hot?

Isn’t the weather glorious.  I don’t think anything beats a British heatwave.  It reminds of just how beautiful our country can be.  Granted, it would be more enjoyable if we weren’t all stuck in the office! So, how can we office workers stay cool in office? Here’s a few tips! If you’re luck enough to[…..]

Latest Posts
26 Jun 2018

Here’s what happened when we took on an apprentice…

A little over 18 months ago, we decided it was time to try something new.  Finding people jobs in Basingstoke and surrounding areas, Wote Street People has always grown organically, but after a stagnant 12 months we wanted to initiate a change. How were we going to do this?  Do we just wait for the[…..]

Latest Posts
07 Jun 2018

Proud of our community champion and awards finalist

Maxine Hart, Operations Director at Wote Street People, made the finals of the recent Place to Be Proud of Awards, nominated alongside Lamb Brooks Solicitors and The Champion Group in the Business and the Community category. Following a public vote, Champion was announced as the winner at a ceremony on 6th June at the Haymarket[…..]

Latest Posts
29 May 2018

How to get a summer job in Basingstoke

Whether you’re back in Basingstoke for the summer or you’ve recently left school or college, getting a summer job is an excellent opportunity to gain valuable work experience and earn funds – it can’t be all work and no play! What type of summer job could you get? Hospitality & Events, Production Line, Warehouse, Admin,[…..]