REDUNDANCY SCORING DURING MATERNITY LEAVE
In Eversheds Legal Services Ltd v De Belin UKEAT/0352/10, the EAT has upheld a decision that a law firm discriminated against a male lawyer on the ground of his sex when it inflated the redundancy selection score of a female colleague who was on maternity leave. It was decided that pregnant employees and those on maternity leave should only be treated more favourably than male colleagues to the extent that this is reasonably necessary to remove the disadvantages occasioned by their condition.
Mr De Belin and a female colleague were put in a pool for redundancy and scored against five criteria. One of the criteria was based on the time between a lawyer completing a piece of work and receiving fees from the client for that work (known as “lock-up”). The relevant reference period considered by Eversheds was the previous 12 months however, during this period the female employee had been on maternity leave. In the circumstances, she was given the highest possible score whereas Mr De Belin was given the lowest possible score based on a relatively bad lock-up performance. Once all criteria had been scored, the female employee scored a total of 0.5 points more than Mr De Belin and Mr De Belin was therefore selected for redundancy.
The EAT, upholding the Tribunal’s decision held that, although pregnant employees and those on maternity leave should sometimes be treated more favourably than their colleagues, this is only the case to the extent that it is reasonably necessary to compensate them for the disadvantages occasioned by their condition. The employer’s decision to award the female employee a notional maximum score in respect of one of the selection criteria, while leaving Mr De Belin with his actual score, was not a proportionate means of removing the woman’s disadvantage.
An alternative, less discriminatory way of removing the female employee’s maternity-related disadvantage would have been to measure the lock-up of both individuals as at the last date on which the female employee was present at work.
This decision highlights to employers that they should not automatically give employees on maternity leave preferential treatment as the “safe option”. Instead, the potential ways of mitigating the disadvantage of maternity absence should be assessed and the most appropriate option chosen.
Unless you’ve been living on Mars, you’ll be aware that gender bias is a hot topic right now. Equality in the workplace is under greater scrutiny than ever before, industry-wide. The spotlight is shining on businesses to change how they recognise gender and to improve opportunities – for everybody. Implicit gender bias within the recruitment[…..]
October 10th, 2018 marks World Mental Health Day, providing another opportunity for all of us to tackle the stigma around mental health at work; opening the discussion around what more can be done to make mental health and wellbeing a higher priority for employers of full-time and part-time jobs in Basingstoke. The theme of this[…..]
Wellbeing in the workplace is regularly making the news headlines. More and more smart employers recruiting for jobs in Basingstoke are asking us how they can create a healthier office space that will attract top talent to their business – and help retain valued employees. More than just a pay check In our previous blog[…..]
So, you’ve found the ideal people to work for your company, provided ongoing training, awarded pay increases and bonuses, improved your benefits…yet still they keep moving on. Sound all too familiar? You’re not alone. With unemployment is at a record low, many employers across the UK are trying harder than ever to hold on to[…..]
Sixteen years ago, I was doing a temping job as a receptionist when the owner of the agency approached me to see if I fancied a go at recruitment. Always open to opportunity, I said yes. Here we are 16 years later and I’m the Operations Director at Wote Street People. Now, I could tell[…..]